Speak to a rep about your business needs
See our product support options
General inquiries and locations
Contact usMean time to repair measures how well your systems and services are running and how well your IT teams are responding and repairing them.
While mean time to repair is the most common usage of MTTR, it’s also an abbreviation for other mean time measurements.
Mean time to repair quantifies the time elapsed between repairing the system, testing it, and fully restoring functional capacity. It is often measured in technical or mechanical repairs. However, it can still be used to assess remote, cloud-based issues as well.
Unlike other MTTR definitions, mean time to repair does not take into account the total outage time. The time it takes for the maintenance team to respond to an alert, acknowledge the alert, and diagnose the problem is not accounted for in the mean time to repair metric.
What is the significance of mean time to repair?
Mean time to repair is an important metric, but it doesn’t account for the entirety of the issue or downtime.
For example: While your team may repair and restore a downed system within an hour, a dissatisfied customer may be waiting 3 hours from the time they reported the incident to when they can continue using the system.
Mean time to recovery quantifies the time elapsed between a system failure (such as a cloud system failure) and when the system is back online.
Unlike mean time to resolve, mean time to recovery does not necessarily measure when the issue is fully fixed or resolved.
Instead, mean time to recovery is calculated based on when the system is back “online,” but the problem may still persist, or there may not yet be safeguards in place to prevent a future occurrence.
What is the significance of mean time to recovery?
Mean time to recovery is often used in service level agreements (SLAs) or maintenance contracts to hold vendors accountable. Within these agreements, vendors may face penalties (e.g., financial penalties) if they fail to meet specific mean time to recovery standards.
Mean time to resolve quantifies the time needed for a system to regain normal operational performance after a failure as well as the time needed to ensure long-term resolution.
It encompasses the time elapsed between when an issue is detected, diagnosis, repair, resolution to normal operational capacity, and any additional time to ensure the issue will not recur.
What is the significance of mean time to resolve?
Mean time to resolve is a reflection of an organization’s ability to fully recover from disruptions. It is also a part of an organization’s commitment to improved performance over time.
Mean time to respond quantifies the duration between the issuance of a problem alert and the initiation of remedial actions by a maintenance organization.
Unlike other MTTR definitions, the mean time to respond metric measures the speed of initial actions, not the complete resolution of the issue.
Mean time to respond is often confused with “mean time to acknowledge (MTTA).” However, instead of simply acknowledging receipt of the problem alert, mean time to respond requires the maintenance organization to engage in the first responsive actions.
Mean time to respond is a reflection of an organization’s agility, speed, and effectiveness in initiation of the first corrective actions.
Mean time to repair quantifies the time elapsed between repairing the system, testing it, and fully restoring functional capacity. It is often measured in technical or mechanical repairs. However, it can still be used to assess remote, cloud-based issues as well.
Unlike other MTTR definitions, mean time to repair does not take into account the total outage time. The time it takes for the maintenance team to respond to an alert, acknowledge the alert, and diagnose the problem is not accounted for in the mean time to repair metric.
What is the significance of mean time to repair?
Mean time to repair is an important metric, but it doesn’t account for the entirety of the issue or downtime.
For example: While your team may repair and restore a downed system within an hour, a dissatisfied customer may be waiting 3 hours from the time they reported the incident to when they can continue using the system.
Mean time to recovery quantifies the time elapsed between a system failure (such as a cloud system failure) and when the system is back online.
Unlike mean time to resolve, mean time to recovery does not necessarily measure when the issue is fully fixed or resolved.
Instead, mean time to recovery is calculated based on when the system is back “online,” but the problem may still persist, or there may not yet be safeguards in place to prevent a future occurrence.
What is the significance of mean time to recovery?
Mean time to recovery is often used in service level agreements (SLAs) or maintenance contracts to hold vendors accountable. Within these agreements, vendors may face penalties (e.g., financial penalties) if they fail to meet specific mean time to recovery standards.
Mean time to resolve quantifies the time needed for a system to regain normal operational performance after a failure as well as the time needed to ensure long-term resolution.
It encompasses the time elapsed between when an issue is detected, diagnosis, repair, resolution to normal operational capacity, and any additional time to ensure the issue will not recur.
What is the significance of mean time to resolve?
Mean time to resolve is a reflection of an organization’s ability to fully recover from disruptions. It is also a part of an organization’s commitment to improved performance over time.
Mean time to respond quantifies the duration between the issuance of a problem alert and the initiation of remedial actions by a maintenance organization.
Unlike other MTTR definitions, the mean time to respond metric measures the speed of initial actions, not the complete resolution of the issue.
Mean time to respond is often confused with “mean time to acknowledge (MTTA).” However, instead of simply acknowledging receipt of the problem alert, mean time to respond requires the maintenance organization to engage in the first responsive actions.
Mean time to respond is a reflection of an organization’s agility, speed, and effectiveness in initiation of the first corrective actions.
A simple way to calculate mean time to repair is to divide the total time (minutes/hours/days) spent on unplanned maintenance by the number of failures.
MTTR Calculation Example
Here is an example of how to calculate MTTR.
Total time spent on unplanned maintenance = 72 hours (3 days)
Total number of failures = 10
72/10 = 7.2. The Mean Time to Repair is 7.2 hours.
When outages occur and services and systems are down, the negative impacts cascade across the business and out to customers and stakeholders. There are quantifiable benefits to reducing mean time to repair.
Performance benchmarking
MTTR can help organizations meet performance benchmarking reporting, which is now often part of budget and contract line items. Performance benchmarking measures an organization’s performance, or lack thereof, in terms of service disruptions and outages—as gauged by MTTR and other key performance indicators (KPIs)—against competitors and industry bests.
These measurements help you identify and determine how to close performance gaps. When MTTR is documented, and then reduced, that’s a measurable performance improvement, which is then reflected in metrics such as time to market, cost per unit, Net Promoter Score (NPS), and customer retention rates.
Improved system reliability
Reliability is the probability that a system performs correctly during a specific time duration. During correct operation, no repair is required or performed, and the system adequately follows defined performance specifications. Reliability measurement is driven by the frequency and impact of failures. When the mean time to repair is reduced, i.e., failures are less frequent and presumably less impactful, then the reliability of systems, services, and processes is improved. That improved system reliability then cascades to better service delivery and customer and employee experiences.
Minimizing business disruption
By improving and increasing system and service availability, organizations can reduce the downtime and outages that disrupt the business; negatively impact customers, stakeholders, and the brand; and potentially incur penalties or fines for missed service level agreements (SLAs). Faster or less frequent repairs help the business resume and maintain normal activities sooner. And the business-critical tasks and personnel that depend on those services and systems can get back to work, keeping customers and stakeholders happy and maintaining the brand in good standing.
Increased productivity
When IT teams must spend considerable time and effort firefighting issues and outages, their everyday tasks take second priority. If the system or service outage impacts them directly, then they’re idled until it’s repaired. Greater periods of service and system stability and availability mean that IT teams can get back to work and focus on the projects they want to be working on, which both better reflect their specialized training and add value to the business. Happy employees are also productive employees, and by increasing employee satisfaction, organizations also boost their retention.
AIOps processes that not only help reduce MTTR but also drive productivity are increasingly important. According to a recent IDC survey, half (50.5 percent) of respondents measured the success of their AIOps solution by how it improved the productivity of their IT teams, with 34.9 percent measuring success by the productivity and satisfaction of their end users. In a separate survey, IDC predicted that skills development powered by automation and generative AI (which factor into AIOps) will help organizations drive $1 trillion in productivity gains worldwide by 2026.
Cost savings due to reduced downtime and less system repairs
The average cost of a critical outage can be as much as $300,000 an hour. When outages occur and repairs take too long, that can trigger a loss of productivity, revenue, and customers. Efficiency gains in well-maintained services and solutions are also reflected in a better return on investment (ROI) because organizations are getting more out of them. When repair times are reduced, customers and stakeholders experience greater periods of availability, and IT teams can dedicate their efforts to activities that meet customer and stakeholder demands and tasks that add value—and drive revenue for the business.
Artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) solutions that leverage AI and machine learning (ML) and automation can help reduce mean time to repair in several ways.
Automated incident resolution
Incident management is usually defined in SLA or contracts as the customer-agreed-upon timelines for responding to and resolving incidents, according to priority, as a function of impact and urgency. Automating the sequential detection, logging, classification, and diagnosis of incidents establishes processes so they can be resolved, closed, and reviewed. Automated incident resolution leverages data about previous known issues and incidents to suggest and apply repeatable resolutions, with minimal or no manual intervention required.
Root cause analysis
To get to the source of an outage, you need to determine why, how, and where it started, i.e., its root cause. This can be a time-consuming, painstaking effort if done manually. AIOps speeds that up, leveraging AI/ML-enabled algorithms that analyze changes, events, logs, and topology, as well as past incidents and data clusters, to help teams identify issues faster, without spending additional time decoding output errors.
With an AIOps-enabled topology view, you can eliminate inaccuracies or speculation in finding problem areas by surfacing top causal nodes, such as where the problem is and its associated events, reduce the waiting time to build a large amount of observable data, and correlate that data to identify and determine the problem cause. Understanding the root cause can help teams take proactive steps to prevent it from repeating, and have a plan of action to resolve it quickly if it does.
Predictive analytics
Predictive analytics leverages AI/ML and now, generative AI, to analyze and learn from previous issues and outages to identify patterns and predict issues ahead of time. AIOps-powered advanced anomaly detection can analyze and correlate massive amounts of data quickly, find outliers in the data, and proactively alert the operator that there’s an issue with a service or multiple services based on events coming into the system.
Being proactive instead or reactive allows organizations to get ahead of issues that could impact the business, employees, and customers; take timely actions when they do occur to prevent small problems from becoming big ones; and instead focus on key value drivers. As a result, those analytics helps organization reduce not just their MTTR, but their mean time between failures (MTBF), too.
Continuous monitoring
The purpose of continuous IT monitoring is to determine how well your IT infrastructure and the underlying components perform in real time. Monitoring is the process of instrumenting specific components of infrastructure and applications to collect data like metrics (resource consumption, response times, CPU and memory usage, and error rates), events, logs, and traces and interpreting it against thresholds, known patterns, and error conditions to turn it into meaningful and actionable insights.
Monitoring is focused on the external behavior of a system, and is most effective in relatively stable environments, where key performance data and normal versus abnormal behavior is known. AIOps enables continuous, real-time monitoring of a service health environment, which allows operators and site reliability engineers (SREs) to observe usage trends, make decisions on provisioning, and identify anomalies, issues, and vulnerabilities, analyze their cause, and quickly remediate them to restore the health of the impacted services.
Augmented collaboration among teams
With AIOps, data is ingested in the form of logs, events, and metrics and taken through a set of algorithms that select specific data points, which are then identified, correlated, and analyzed and passed into a collaborative work environment. Because AIOps solutions automate monitoring and management processes, they elevate the role of ITOps teams, allowing them to spend less time troubleshooting and more time collaborating with business units to advance their strategies and put innovation to work.
AIOps gives also IT teams spanning the service desk, change management, infrastructure operations, development, and QA a single dashboard with a unified view of the health of the service environment, as well as real-time monitoring of logs, events, and metrics so they can collaborate and share knowledge, working together to resolve issues much faster than they could working on siloed teams with disparate sets of data.
Customer experience
Delivering quality customer experiences can make or break a business, and repeat or lengthy outages that impact customer service and delivers a subpar experience can send them to a competitor. In fact, 63 percent of consumers are less likely to forgive a disappointing digital experience than they were before the pandemic. A bad experience can also impact your NPS or create bad word of mouth if customers take their dissatisfaction to social media. Understanding and improving mean time to repair can help companies ensure they’re running normally—or get them there as soon as possible—to keep customers happy, increase customer loyalty, encourage repeat business and positive word of mouth, and bolster brand reputation.
Competitive advantage
Improving MTTR helps businesses identify and address problem areas that can be improved, which can positively impact their financial and operational performance and give them a competitive edge. Resolving failures quickly also helps organizations focus their attention on the business-critical, day-to-day operations that are integral to delivering optimal customer experiences and dedicate resources to the innovations that address evolving customer demands so they can bring new enhancements to market faster.
Data-driven decision-making
Having concrete MTTR data gives organizations the metrics they need to better understand recurring issues and weaknesses; track how efficiently they’re addressed; identify areas for improvement; take action through upgrades, enhancements, and training; and measure the effectiveness of those improvements and actions. By combining big data and ML to automate the IT operations processes that previously required significant time and effort, AIOps creates efficiencies at scale, enables visibility across your infrastructure, and helps teams derive the insights they need to make powerful, data-driven business decisions more easily.
For example, measuring MTTR against customer surveys and self-service feedback about how service issues impacted the customer experience, or which issues had the most direct impact, can help organizations prioritize them. In a recent DataOps report commissioned by BMC, 77 percent of organizations with a more mature DataOps strategy (that leverages AI and automation technology) said their use of data has had a significant impact on customer satisfaction.
BMC offers a range of solutions to help with MTTR.
Leverage the power of generative AI and observability to identify and prevent IT issues before they arise.
Learn moreElevate service assurance, allocate IT spending effectively, and proactively forecast future requirements with predictive intelligence.
Learn moreAlign IT resources with business service demands, optimizing resource usage and reducing costs.
Learn moreIDG Tech Dossier for BMC: Ready for Business: A Modern Mainframe Requires Intelligent Management
BMC Exchange session: Accelerate MTTR with AIOps and Log Analytics
White paper: ServiceOps: Redefining IT Excellence
Blog: Zero Touch, Zero Trouble Starts with AIOps-Enabled Service Assurance
The New Stack: Re-Evaluating MTTR as Key Metric for Operational Performance
Blog: Improve IT Performance and Availability with BMC Helix AIOps Capabilities